Outstanding.I guess Ime had no plans on Mothers Day.
And totally the wrong year to win.Atlanta!
That’s what their biggest win in 15 years? Ever?
likely they have #17 this year, 2029 1st and some swaps to offer, plus Reaves?What assets do the Lakers have? Not sure how many of their picks they still control.
I guess it would be Russell, Reaves, then all of the 1sts and swaps. Not a bad offer, not particularly greatlikely they have #17 this year, 2029 1st and some swaps to offer, plus Reaves?
If for some reason the Pelicans want #17, then they would have 2025 1st, 2029 1st and swaps.
Edit- they can trade 2031 1st as well
Sounds like their typical pu pu platter of mid. Not sure how they get Mitchell with that "haul," but stranger things have happened.likely they have #17 this year, 2029 1st and some swaps to offer, plus Reaves?
If for some reason the Pelicans want #17, then they would have 2025 1st, 2029 1st and swaps.
Edit- they can trade 2031 1st as well
It's not great, and I don't see any reason for CLE to trade Mitchell, but....Sounds like their typical pu pu platter of mid. Not sure how they get Mitchell with that "haul," but stranger things have happened.
I wouldn't call that quality assets though.
The Cavs will get a HAUL for him, if it’s to a team he wants.I don't think it's nothing, but I think someone looking to land Mitchell could offer a lot more. A lot would depend on if Mitchell would sign an extension with the team is being traded to, if he is, it will take more to get him.
What are the obvious fits for him other than LAL, meaning teams he'd be willing to be traded to that are a good fit and have some assets?I don't think it's nothing, but I think someone looking to land Mitchell could offer a lot more. A lot would depend on if Mitchell would sign an extension with the team is being traded to, if he is, it will take more to get him.
Unless he demands LAL or bust(which isn't out of the question), I just see a few other teams who can easily put together a more appealing package. Just depends on what Cleveland wants to do. Houston/OKC/Knicks off the top of my head for players + tons of picks. ATL + NOLA could offer Murray / Ingram and pick(s) - or maybe something that turns into a three-way deal.The Cavs will get a HAUL for him, if it’s to a team he wants.
I agree it could be an intriguing fit if Pop is interested, I'm just skeptical either side would be though. The rest of the roster still needs a lot of work even if Wemby is all world.He's 27, not 33, I have to think he'd look at SAS and see a legendary coach re-energized, that Wemby is basically ready to win now, and that they'd complement each other very well. Not sure Mitchell is necessarily Pop's cup of tea, but if they got him, they could probably avoid having to get a true star PG in there, and instead get a defense-first PG who's a good distributor and doesn't need to be a primary scoring option - a Derrick White type, really.
This right here. Mitchell (errrr, his agents) can control his destination by making it known that he will only sign an extension with the Lakers thus forcing the Cavs into a corner….if this is truly what he wants.I don't think it's nothing, but I think someone looking to land Mitchell could offer a lot more. A lot would depend on if Mitchell would sign an extension with the team is being traded to, if he is, it will take more to get him.
Agree with all of that.This right here. Mitchell (errrr, his agents) can control his destination by making it known that he will only sign an extension with the Lakers thus forcing the Cavs into a corner….if this is truly what he wants.
Kind of, though LA is really on a 1 year window if he’s going to LA for a title, so Cleveland can probably call that bluff.This right here. Mitchell (errrr, his agents) can control his destination by making it known that he will only sign an extension with the Lakers thus forcing the Cavs into a corner….if this is truly what he wants.
Thank you, NBC.TNT stop trying to make draymond a thing. He's a POS.