Or a much more expensive one. Would you take back Rendon? ~3/$105 remaining compared to Yoshida's ~4/$72.
The glove has fallen off from its elite days, but is still *probably* above average — given all his recent health woes, the recent numbers are a mixed bag, but that's probably a scouting judgment. The bat, health, and general vibes are pretty dubious. It's been years since he's slugged even .400. Maybe getting back to the East Coast would be good for him, despite himself.
FWIW (not a ton), BTV sees Yoshida at par and Rendon a cool $80m below par. I don't actually think that either Rendon's deal is quite that far underwater or that Yoshida's is in quite that good shape; let's say the discrepancy is more like $40m. I imagine the Angels would leap at something like Yoshida and maybe one of our mid-list infield prospects (Eddinson Paulino?) for Rendon and still-only-25 post-prospect Jo Adell and, say, $30m: maybe we'd accept even less in money if Breslow and Bailey could pick one or two from among the Angels dozen or so B+ pitching prospects.
On paper, that still wildly favors the Angels, and it would allow them to shed Rendon and his money and play Yoshida half and half in LF — sharing the corner duties with Ward, Hicks, and Moniak — and at DH, sharing with the RH Sanó. Sanó is nominally a 3B, but I imagine they'd want to play one of Drury or Rengifo there. (They can have a lightly used Bobby Dalbec if they want.)
Rendon is, after all, a player who has finished high in MVP voting more than once, and his acquisition would allow Devers to DH and give us another RHH. He's basically a singles hitter at this point, but he makes good contact and draws a ton of walks. Adell would be a Franchy Cordero-style flier. He's a tools monster (he's hit a ball 117 mph and has high-end sprint speed) off to a hot start, but only in like 40 PA. He hasn't performed in several stints and is now out of options.