I'm not looking to start another run of "here's what I would trade for Stanton" posts... we've all gone there and many of us have already posted what we think. However, I don't think anyone on this board would complain about Betts for Stanton straight up. What might be unpopular is a package where Betts is one of several top prospects moved. That, at least, is debatable. Betts for Stanton straight up? Or Betts plus a bunch of prospects in the 10-40 range? We'd all be doing back flips.